Committees: Misconduct report form
Misconduct hearing reports give GSA the information we need to stay informed about practices and outcomes from misconduct committees, and work with the University to improve compliance and equity of outcomes.
Your report goes to GSA's Representation team, and information from your reports may be discussed with GSA Council, UMSU Advocacy and University decision-makers.
What kind of misconduct was the hearing for?
If academic, which faculty was the student from?
Architecture, Building and Planning
Business and Economics
Engineering and IT
Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences
Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences
VCA and MCM
Briefly explain the nature of misconduct
(Plagiarism, collusion, fraud, etc.)
Date of hearing
Which of the following documents were you provided with?
Allegation notice to the student
Written student statement responding to allegation
Evidence of misconduct
Explanation of the situation from relevant staff
If academic, description of assignment or exam
Written student statement of appeal
Who was the staff member who sent you papers?
Was the student graduate or undergraduate?
Were you able to tell if the student was...
Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander
First year student
Someone with learning difficulties
Was the allegation upheld?
What recommendations did the committee make as to penalties?
Reprimand and caution the student
Agree with student a course of corrective action
Agree with student on a course of counselling
Exclude from Uni premises, facilities, services etc
Impose conditions on using Uni services/facilities
Require student to resubmit assessment
Removal of credit for assessment
Removal of credit for subject
Fine student up to $1,000
Fine up to $1,000 and cost of damages
Prohibit student bringing vehicle onto premises
Student to refrain from contact w/ certain people
Student undertake work, activities, apologies etc
Suspension of enrolment
Termination of enrolment
Revocation of award
Refuse to enrol an applicant as a student
Were there any issues with the way the hearing committee operated? If so, what were they?
Student didn't attend and committee was still held
Not enough evidence given to make determination
I was asked to leave when penalties were discussed
I was treated as observer or advocate
Committee members rude or aggressive
Penalties inconsistent or disproportional
Appeared to be conflict of interest on committee
Committee members unaware of proper processes
Is there anything else you'd like to add?
Your submission is being processed. Please do not close this browser window until complete.