Comprehensive ELG School Self-Evaluation (EOY)

Comprehensive ELG School Self-Evaluation (EOY) - Cohorts 5 & 6

The End of Year (EOY) data analysis and goal reporting is a collaborative process between grantees and implementation consultants. However, this report should be completed and submitted by school personnel only.

This form is only for Comprehensive ELG Cohorts 5 & 6 EOY reporting.

When uploading your reports, please ensure each required report follows the requested naming convention formats.

Note : Smartsheet does not save works in progress.

Submitter's Information

Please tell us your name (First Last)*

Please provide your email address*

Your position/role*

ELG Cohort*

Select

Please select your District/BOCES name and code*

Select

Please select the school/site you are reporting on.*

One form per school must be submitted.

Select

EOY Early Literacy Grant Goal Reporting

ELG Goal 1: Students in the well below benchmark category make above average progress or well above average progress in reading each year.*

This goal applies to the group of K-3 students who participated in both the BOY and end of year (EOY) of the mCLASS® DIBELS 8th assessment.

Progress will be measured and reported using the following:

Grantees will use mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Progress Planning Tool - Well Below Benchmark to measure and report on this goal
Grantees may also use mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Zones of Growth to measure progress.
mCLASS® Lectura ASSESSMENTS (optional, if applicable)
Submit Lectura data if you have students whose primary language of literacy instruction is Spanish and provide a narrative

Select

EOY ELG Goal 1 Context

Please provide any information CDE should be aware of related to this site's status on meeting ELG Goal 1.

ELG Goal 2: Students make above average progress or well above average progress achieving grade-level reading proficiency.*

This goal applies to the group of K-3 students who participated in both the BOY and end of year (EOY) of the mCLASS® DIBELS 8th assessment.

Proficiency (students performing at or above benchmark on mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition assessment) will be reported using the following:

Grantees will use mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Progress Planning Tool - Well Below Benchmark to measure and report on this goal
Grantees will use mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Progress Planning Tool - At/Above Benchmark Levels
Grantees may also use mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Zones of Growth to measure progress.
mCLASS® Lectura ASSESSMENTS (optional, if applicable)
Submit Lectura data if you have students whose primary language of literacy instruction is Spanish and provide a narrative

Select

EOY ELG Goal 2 Context

Please provide any information CDE should be aware of related to this site's status on meeting on ELG Goal 2.

ELG Goal 3: 50% of students scoring below benchmark move up at least one performance category.*

This goal applies to the group of K-3 students who participated in both the BOY and EOY mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition and scored below benchmark or well below benchmark on the BOY assessment.

This goal is intended to measure the progress and proficiency of students who began the year performing below benchmark on the Acadience Reading assessment.

This 50% can include students who moved from the well below benchmark category to the below benchmark category or above AND students who moved from the below benchmark category to the benchmark category or above.

Grantees will use mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Correlation report to report progress and proficiency at the end of the year.
mCLASS® Lectura ASSESSMENTS (optional, if applicable)
Submit Lectura data if you have students whose primary language of literacy instruction is Spanish and provide a narrative

Select

EOY ELG Goal 3 Context

Please provide any information CDE should be aware of related to this site's status on meeting on ELG Goal 2.

Data Reporting File Uploads

Evidence must be provided for every goal that is marked as "met".

Goal 1 "Met" Evidence: If you selected "Met" for goal one, attach your completed mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Progress Planning Tool - Well Below Benchmark

School Code_School Name_ G1

Goal 2 "Met" Evidence: If you selected "Met" for goal two, attach your completed mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Progress Planning Tool - At/Above Benchmark Levels

School Code_School Name_ G2

Goal 3 "Met" Evidence: If you selected "Met" for goal three, attach your K-3 mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Correlation report(s)

School Code_School Name_ G3

Literacy Evaluation Tool (LET) must be uploaded for all sites.

School Code_School Name_LET

mCLASS® Lectura ASSESSMENTS (optional, if applicable)

Submit Lectura data if you have students whose primary language of literacy instruction is Spanish and provide a narrative
School Code_School Name_ Lectura

File Upload Section*

More than one file may be added. Evidence must be provided for each goal that has been marked as "met". Completed LET must also be added in this section.

Please Note:

Upload the completed Literacy Evaluation Tool (LET)
Each goal requires different reports as evidence listed in the previous section
mCLASS Lectura data may also be optionally added in addition to, and not in lieu of, the required reports
Please use the naming conventions listed in the description above.

Drag and drop files here or

School Leadership

The School Leadership Team (SLT) includes at a minimum a district administrator, building administrator, kindergarten and/or first grade teacher, second grade and/or third grade teacher, a literacy coach and an interventionist.*

Select

The SLT leads efforts to embed the essential components of reading instruction into all elements of K-3 teaching structures.*

Select

District-level personnel are represented on a regular basis to support grant activities.*

Select all that apply.

Select

District leadership is committed to supporting the school in implementing SBRR and all other requirements of the grant*

Select

The SLT regularly reviews K-3 student-level data (from interim and diagnostic assessments) and data related to the implementation of grant requirements.*

Select

The SLT develops and regularly updates the professional development plan related to K-3 literacy assessment and instruction, based on reviewed data.*

Select

The principal routinely visits classrooms with the literacy coach and ELG Implementation Consultant.*

Select

A change in school leadership occurred this school year*

Select

Provide a summary of school leadership and ELG progression.*

Use this field to further explain the answers in the leadership section and to elaborate on the the district and school leadership involvement in the grant work being done.

Staff

School has a full-time K-3 literacy coach. (Or, if school has fewer than six K-3 teachers, school has a part-time coach or the role of the coach is filled by existing staff.)*

Select

Literacy coach works with the ELG Implementation Consultant to assist in program and assessment implementation.*

Select

Literacy coach provides feedback and support to teachers between ELG Implementation Consultant visits.*

Select

Staff is committed to implementing the Comprehensive ELG Program.*

If not all staff have made this commitment, select "Not Met" and explain in the feedback question for this section. Avoid using personally identifiable information in your responses.

Select

Provide a summary of staff participation/involvement and ELG progression.*

Use this field to further explain the answers in the staff section and to elaborate on the grant work being done at the instructional and coaching levels.

Curriculum Assurances

K-3 uses core instructional program(s) from CDE's Advisory List of Instructional Programming.*

For more information: https://www.cde.state.co.us/coloradoliteracy/advisorylistofinstructionalprogramming2020

Select

K-3 uses instructional program(s) from CDE's Advisory List of Instructional Programming to provide targeted and intensive instructional interventions for students reading below grade level, including students identified as having an SRD.*

For more information: https://www.cde.state.co.us/coloradoliteracy/advisorylistofinstructionalprogramming2020

Select

Assessments and Data Collection

School participates in the ELAT Project through mCLASS DIBELS 8th*

Select

Grantees and Implementation Consultants use the following tools throughout the year to regularly set student-level goals and to measure progress:*

All three tools must have been used in order to select "Met"

mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Zones of Growth (ZoG)
CDE provided mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Progress Planning Tools - Reaching Benchmark
CDE provided mCLASS® DIBELS 8th Edition Progress Planning Tools - and Well Below Benchmark

Select

School follows progress monitoring schedule, at minimum, set by ELAT.*

PROGRESS MONITORING SCHEDULE FOR ELAT

Students in Well Below Benchmark: every 7-10 days
Students in Below Benchmark: every 10-12 days

Select

School grants their ELG Implementation Consultant access to school-level data.*

Select

Provide a summary of assessment and data analysis structures.*

Include benchmark, interim, and progress monitoring systems. Be sure to address frequency of the different assessments, and how data analysis informs instructional decision making.

Professional Development

All instructional professional development provided to principals and teachers is SBRR-supported.*

Select

SLT attends the required ELG CDE-provided professional development.*

All members of the SLT must have completed the required training.

Note that some members of the SLT may be required to attend more PD than others.
All requirements for different roles on the SLT must have been met to select "met".

Select

School participates in professional development provided by ELG Implementation Consultant.*

Select

School schedules ongoing, on-site assistance at least one day per month from an ELG Implementation Consultant*

Select

Provide a summary of the professional development and Implementation Consultant work done under the ELG.*

ELG Implementation Consultant Partnership

Consultant works with our SLT to analyze progress at the student, class, and grade levels throughout the school year.*

Select

Consultant provides regular on-site assistance at least one day per month per school during the school year.*

Select

Consultant effectively guides our school leadership team in how to maximize core instruction and intervention time to ensure K-3 reading proficiency.*

Select

Consultant meets regularly with our school leadership team, including the principal, to review K-3 data.*

Student-level, classroom-level, grade level, and K-3 school level data should be reviewed collectively throughout the year.

Select

Consultant routinely visits classrooms with the coach and principal.*

Select

Consultant works with coaches and administration to provide feedback and support to teachers between ELG Implementation Consultant visits.*

Select

Consultant completes the literacy evaluation tool (LET) with us.*

Select

Consultant works with us to embed explicit and systematic instruction of the five components of reading into all elements of the K-3 teaching structures, including core instruction and targeted and intensive instructional interventions*

Select

Please provide any additional information you would like CDE to know about your ELG Implementation Consultant.

Implementation & Planning

School updates their ELG implementation plan on an ongoing basis.*

Select "Met" if the school provides updates beyond the minimum required one time per month meetings. If no updates between the required monthly meetings are provided, select "Not Met" and explain in the feedback section for Implementation & Planning.

Select

Provide a summary of how the ELG plan is aligned with the school UIP.*

Include information on how the school updates the ELG implementation consultant between the monthly required meetings.

ELG Funding

Funds only supplement and do not supplant any moneys previously/currently used.*

Select

All funds are expended in accordance with allowable expenditures*

Select

School ensures that all other professional development provided through ELG funding is aligned with the purpose of this grant program and is scientifically and evidence-based or is on one of the CDE's advisory lists for professional development.*

Select

Project modifications and changes in the approved budget are requested and approved in writing by CDE before modifications are made to expenditures*

Select

Annual financial report (AFR) reflecting expenditures of the prior fiscal year was/will be submitted on time.*

Select

Carryover budget request is submitted on time.

Select

Interim financial report (IFR) reflecting expenditures July 1 - December 31 of the current fiscal year is submitted on time.*

Select

Provide a summary of any budget rationale to support your answers in the budget section (optional).*

Check the box below for a copy of your responses.

Send me a copy of my responses

Privacy Notice|Report Abuse