ELG - PD Evaluation Report

ELG Professional Development grantees should complete this form annually. Please answer the questions in 100-500 words (questions about funding amounts can be shorter). There is an optional field for additional information or context at the end.

PLEASE NOTE:

Smartsheet does not save works in progress.

Please tell us your name (First Last)

Please provide your email address

Your Position/Role

Please select your District/BOCES name and code:

Please select the school/site you are reporting on.

Select "District Only" if you are reporting district or BOCES only (no specific school site). Select Other/Not listed if your site is not on this list.

Did you use funds for services provided by a CDE-Approved Implementation Consultant

Implementation Outcomes

Please provide a narrative summary of ELG PD grant outcomes you provided in your grant application under Section B: Professional Development Plan. Your application can be viewed in GAINS.

You can review the application rubric items referenced in this section in the 2024-2025 RFA.

Professional Development Plan Outcomes: Section B1

Explain your progress on meeting the major goals and objectives detailed in your ELG PD application in Section B.1. Include rationale for those that you did not meet. Be sure to clearly state each objective and goal in your response.

Instructional Practice(s) | Teacher Knowledge Outcomes: Section B3a

Explain your progress on meeting the major goals and objectives detailed in your ELG PD application in Section(s) B2 (if applicable) and section B.3a. Include rationale for those that you did not meet.

Student Achievement Outcomes: Section B.3. b and c

Explain your progress on meeting the major goals and objectives detailed in your ELG PD application in Sections B.3. band c. Include rationale for those goals and/or objectives you did not meet.

Please use this field to add optional artifacts that support your outcome summaries.

Drop your files here

ELG PD Grant Impact Statements

If you are also a grantee for other Early Literacy Grants, please ensure your answers in this section are specific to the ELG Professional Development grant.

What are the most significant shifts in instructional practice(s) regarding early literacy instruction at your school this year?

Briefly highlight the changes you are seeing at the site regarding literacy instruction. Specific examples to support statements are helpful..

What are the most significant shifts in school systems and instructional supports this year?

Briefly share any major strategies or changes at the system level that have helped improve instructional support and literacy practices overall.

Highlight a specific example or story of how the grant work has positively impacted a student, teacher, or others involved in the grant work.

The CDE is seeking stories we can highlight and share with others as part of our work related to the Colorado READ Act. These stories may be shared with leadership, the State Board of Education, or our communications team. Please do not use personally identifiable information in your response.

What are some major barriers to implementation or success at this time?

The CDE is looking to improve our support and assurances for grant implementation. This information helps us assess our own work and pinpoint how to better support our grantees and implementation consultants. This answer can include assurances that make grant implementation difficult, and can also include school-specific challenges that we may not be aware of.

Are there any additional comments or information you would like to share with the CDE?

(Optional)

Send me a copy of my responses

Report Abuse