Copy - Career Research Faculty Professional Development Program

Evaluation Form

2024-25

Please base your review on the criteria below, assessing the project narrative, CV, and budget justification.

Review Criteria

The form's questions use a 1-5 scale:

1 - Excellent

2 - Very Good

3 - Good

4 - Fair

5 - Poor

Career Faculty Professional Development Statement*

How clearly does the application articulate the alignment of the professional development to their position description and promotion trajectory? Evaluate the significance and potential impact to advancing the faculty and the research unit (in scholarship, research expertise) of the proposed professional development.

Is the timeline feasible for completion in one year?

Select
Caret IconCaret symbol
Budget*

Is the budget within the funding allowance? Is it reasonable for the benefit of the professional development to be received to individual and research entity? Will the research entity provide cost share?

Cost Share*

Has the research entity provided cost share for this PD opportunity?


Please summarize your review of the proposal’s strengths and weaknesses in 1-2 brief paragraphs. This text will be shared anonymously with the applicant and is intended to provide further transparency in our feedback and align our process with the peer-review procedures from federal granting agencies. We ask that you comment on the application's strength's, as well as identify clear suggestions for improvement.


Example: "The proposal is well written and articulates clearly and persuasively the intellectual significance of the proposed project. The application also provides ample evidence of PI's qualifications to conduct the proposed research and ability to bring that research to successful completion. The proposal could be improved with a more thorough description of methodology in order to determine whether the outcomes can be achieved, and a clearer articulation of the theoretical framework."

Please add any comments here that you wish to remain confidential and discussed in the review meeting only. These remarks will not be shared with the applicant.

Privacy Notice|Report Abuse